Art versus Vandalism
By Casey Runco (age 17)
Graffiti may be the most controversial art form on the streets. Though it may be a passion for some, local communities are fed up with what they consider "vandalism".
Graffiti artists could argue that their art takes patience and talent, whereas vandalism does not. To local residents it all looks the same, and these artists" are just a menace. This could be viewed as a narrow minded perspective.
Some are not keen to embrace this modern art that is sky rocketing into the public eye as the "new in thing".
There are many different types and styles of graffiti, as it is a rapidly evolving art form, criticized by authorities, yet also a subject of protection as a worthy art form to be displayed.
Local "writer" Jay* said graffiti often gets an undeserved reputation.
"I think there are too many young kids coming up and not understanding it as an art form," he said.
"Like any group of people there's always going to be a minority that will spoil it for the majority."
Tagging is by far the most common form of graffiti, and is what most local residents would refer to as vandalism. In most countries, defacing property with graffiti without the property owner's consent is considered vandalism; however tags can be an amazing form of expression.
They are sometimes employed to communicate social and political messages.
"Some may do it as an art form, no doubt a large percentage also do it for the fame," Jay* said. There is always going to be a divided audience on this topic. No matter how many people are against the idea of graffiti, however, it will always be a form of legitimate expression in art.
The fact is there are no legal places to graffiti in the local community, forcing writers to create victims out of shop owners and residential architecture.
Jay* said: "The risk has always been part of it and I'd say always will be, but could be lessened by councils providing a safe place to do it."
Graffiti on a legal wall could provide a safe place for kids to graff openly, and keep them from "vandalizing" the streets.
It's a win win situation. What's wrong with a brightly coloured piece on an unused wall, when it provides closure to residents of the area, and a chance to show off unique artwork?
